glen lall bans freddie kissoon from writing about donald ramotar

back in april we told freddie not to get back in bed with that devil and weasel glen lall, but he don’t listen. now he swallowing shit glen and adam harris shovelling his way. check out glen lall full of cocaine fury in his response at the end of freddie letter

Dear Editor,
Why the silence of Mr. Freddie Kissoon on the Presidential candidate, Mr. Donald Ramotar? Mr. Freddie Kissoon, a columnist of the independent Kaieteur News, covers a range of topics, issues and personalities relevant to Guyana and Guyanese.
His columns certainly keep one in touch with what is happening locally and particularly what is happening on the ground floor with the ordinary people. To use sports parlance, KN is the house that Freddie Kissoon built.  It is striking that in the light of the upcoming Guyanese elections that Mr. Freddie Kissoon has not yet written on or about Mr. Donald Ramotar, the PPP Presidential Candidate! It seems particularly odd for this engaging columnist of the independent Kaieteur News to be so silent. We must therefore consider the possibilities to account for this unusual quietness: Firstly, let us consider Mr. Kissoon himself. Either Kissoon has lost his courage to openly discuss Mr. Ramotar, or does not think this candidate of the PPP is worthwhile to comment on. From what we know of the history of Mr. Kissoon, these possible explanations are extremely unlikely.
Secondly, let us consider the ownership and management of KN. We have to ask if Mr. Glenn Lall (owner of KN and a personal friend of the Presidential Candidate, Mr. Donald Ramotar) has ordered Mr. Kissoon not to write on Mr. Ramotar in his columns.  Or, was it that the written material was not published by KN on orders of Mr. Lall?
Both possibilities are not what we would expect from Mr. Glenn Lall and Kaieteur News. We are therefore asking Mr. Freddie Kissoon to respond to our enquiries as to why he is not writing on Mr. Ramotar, and whether or not the owner of KN, Mr. Glenn Lall, has placed restrictions on him?
Likewise, would Mr. Glenn Lall please tell us whether or not he has placed restrictions on Mr. Kissoon and/or his writings. The journalistic independence and credibility of KN as an independent daily is at stake.
Seelochan Beharry
Jason Benjamin,
Anand Daljeet,
Malcolm Harripaul

freddie’s response which kaieteur news been holding onto for a couple days. they were forced to publish it as it’s circulating by other means

former? field negroe - freddie kissoon

Dear Editor,
I refer to a letter in Monday’s edition (Oct 24) of SN signed by four persons (all of whom are good friends). Titled, ‘Why is Kissoon not writing on Ramotar?’ the missive requests an explanation. I suspect that these four friends were not content with a private answer and wanted a public response from me and Glen Lall. Well here is mine. The answer lies in the fact that the Kaieteur News has refused to print the letter itself.
The answer lies in the fact that a UGWU press release stating that Mr Ramotar has declined a presidential debate at UG was carried in SN but not by KN. I am at a loss about this type of thinking by KN management. Such news cannot hide.
For example, when I was in Justice Ramlal’s court on Monday morning to answer contempt of court charges brought against me by Juan Edghill, lawyers and other people were asking me if and when I will reply.
They put the same question to me at my workplace, UG. Since then I have had to respond to the identical query wherever I go. Citizens read the letter in SN. The same with the press release. All Guyana knows that Mr Ramotar refused to debate his presidential contenders at UG. They read it in the SN. I simply cannot understand why KN’s management did not print the letter.
Shall I go on to answer the question when the answer is there? I do not think that Glenn Lall is the first or will be the last owner of a media house to have a protective shield over certain persons in society, business and politics. This happens in the media business the world over. This doesn’t mean it is right. It is not, and society should not accept it. This of course does not exonerate me from a public statement on the restriction placed upon me not to write critically of Donald Ramotar. I believe my four friends want such an open attitude on the issue from me. Here it is.
I concede that my acceptance by the KN management of the restriction against criticism of Mr Ramotar can be cited as a fault in my character. I will not try to defend that weakness of mine. I admit that. I apologize to those who think it has damaged my long-standing independence of mind. But there are redemptive dimensions which at the end of this correspondence, I hope the readers and by extension the Guyanese people understand. [freddie you must stop talkin scunt. there's nothing redemptive about your position]
I cherish my independence of thought. I took it from my dad. But my dad was a semi-literate groundsman who had no alternatives when he talked back to people and employers who insulted him. His life ended up tragically because he didn’t have options. I vowed that I would plug that loophole in my life. I was the only one of seven siblings that went beyond primary school. I pledged to myself that if I followed in my dad’s footsteps, I would need an education.
I went right up to the doctoral programme at the University of Toronto. When I came home, I chose an academic job that gave me scope to pursue my independent thought. I refused the second position at the local UNDP office that Mr Yesu Persaud had negotiated with the then head, Juan Larraburre. I didn’t want restrictions on my right to be a human rights activist. The UN job would have done just that. So yes, I admit the Ramotar ban has upset me given what I have just written about my evolution.
Against this background, I can understand how my four friends feel about me being unable to criticize Mr Ramotar as a columnist in the newspaper I write for Jason Benjamin, one of the signatories, must be particularly peeved at me. When he was a young student leader at UG I instilled in him the need to be critically independent.
Here now are the redemptive aspects that I alluded to above. It is not my choice not to analyse the politics of Donald Ramotar. That is a restriction placed on me by KN so that context must be understood. I would gladly assess Ramotar. He is certainly not the right choice for Guyana and if elected would be expected to continue on the destructive path of Mr Jagdeo. I find Mr Ramotar an irredeemable politician.
Secondly, why should I feel guilty about the ban and therefore stop my columns? I know there is a valid criticism of me, but what about the higher purpose of my commentary? I have talked with close friends, relatives and people that I admire immensely about this Donald Ramotar edict of Mr Lall after the public spat between me and Glenn Lall in April this year. I swear on my parents’ grave there wasn’t a dissenter.
All the advice was that I should continue to do what I do because there is a need for my columns in Guyana. All those that I consulted told me it would be foolish to walk away from the columns because of the Ramotar restriction. I honestly cannot see how people can ask me to stop writing when I know in my heart that there is a vast need for my analyses out there.
Though my acceptance of the imposition placed on me can be used to criticize me (and I think that is what my four friends are doing in a principled way), I believe and sincerely do feel that the other  purpose of my continuation with the Kaieteur News should be taken into consideration. This then is my response to the four persons that I have a lot of respect for. It is left to Mr Lall to respond to them.
Frederick Kissoon 

Publisher’s note: It has not escaped notice that Freddie Kissoon has been hounding the PPP with a vengeance and his writings clearly show this.
Obviously, his motive, both expressed and inferred is to seek the defeat of the Jagdeo administration.
It is not the policy of this newspaper to seek the defeat of any administration. It is also not the policy of this paper to have a columnist carp daily to remove a government.
In Kaieteur News, Kissoon was given a lot of leverage, perhaps too much. At the end of the day the buck stops at the desk of the owner and publisher of Kaieteur News.
This newspaper cannot care less about Kissoon’s four friends and what they want.
The owner and publisher must protect and maintain this newspaper that he and the staff built to become the leading newspaper in Guyana today. This meant that their judgement and decisions all these years could not be wrong.
The query by Kissoon’s four friends begs further queries. Why only Donald Ramotar?
Why have they not asked Freddie to write about Granger or Ramjattan or Trotman?  Surely, they have axes to grind.
They themselves can write about any subject they choose. They are all academics and the letter pages are always available. Instead, they want Kissoon to wield their axes.
And there is one cold, hard fact. The final decision rests with the publisher and not with Freddie Kissoon or anyone else.

Related articles

• kaieteur news owner glen lall cocaine in logs busted on Guyana wharf? (propagandapress.wordpress.com)
• dear glen lall, a quick message from propaganda press (propagandapress.wordpress.com)
• glen lall says he ‘lost’ his 9mm glock pistol (propagandapress.wordpress.com)
• glen lall & co sends propaganda press another death threat – three & counting (propagandapress.wordpress.com)
• propaganda press receives death threat from glen lall’s agent narifa ally (propagandapress.wordpress.com)

Tags: adam harris, Donald Ramotar, freddie kissoon, glen lall, guyana, guyana press association, kaieteur news