this information comes to you from our 009 agents in the fields working behind enemy lines. keep in mind while the Guyana Police Farce still fumbling, one of our 009 agents tied the Nicolas Hoyte murder to Hits & Jams TV.

Rawle Harding

double dealin snitch - james girvan singh

If you’re a customer of Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry [a subsidiary of PPP Crime Family Inc.] we would like you to know that your account is being monitored by the wife of James Girvan Singh (head of CANU). This woman just happens to be a senior employee at the said bank.

The same thing is happening at the Guyana Telephone and Telegraph Company (GTT) James Singh is getting print outs of people cell phone and landline phone number without applying to the relevant authority. and the CIA is not fully operational yet

We are trying to find out what happened to the much vaunted privacy act that supposedly covers the Bank and GT&T if this kind of behavior is tolerated it can only bring bad for both companies. In the meantime James Singh is having fun harassing innocent people who want to speak out against Roger Khan partners in crime and crime financed businesses.

James Girvan Singh is also out to protect some of those very partners. double dealing and trying to feed from both sides of the trough as he is doing with saim juman azeez. if James Singh had allowed Dennis Edwards aka Death to be arrested and charged he might have been in prison and the poor Canadian fellow Rawle Harding who was killed at Cool Square would have been alive today. he was the one that send those criminals to the Canadian. something went wrong after the Canadian crashed the car and broke his leg. now his family is keeping wake in Number 1 Canal, but do they really know why he is dead?

All those years James Singh could not afford to buy a car for his mother but after one year at CANU the cocaine thief purchased a brand new car for her which he is going about the place bragging about.

Remember that it was just the beginning of March 2010 CANU officers went to a house in Craig Street where they arrested the brother of Farouk Razac aka Jesus with a few ounces of crack cocaine. On reporting this to James Singh, he instructed those men to return the cocaine and release Jesus. [you can catch Jesus at any of those rock n roll or heavy metal shows going on about the place]

This is similar to the incident involving his cousin Raymond aka Blackface house in Laluni Street. The raid was called off because James Singh did not approve of his cousin’s house being searched.

The DEA in Trinidad is giving money to Queen James to cultivate informants in Guyana but he is putting the money to his own use and benefit.

James Singh is a classic double dealing Snitch. He met with the DEA and promised them to give up his friends (Roger Khan minions and others) so this is why we see the US 2010 Guyana Cocaine update has glowing praises for CANU and Queen James while writing ill things about the Guyana Government. They are working him hard, but time will come when they themselves will have to put a flat sharp object between his ribs.

The Government of Guyana is slowly realizing that they have employed a deadly rattle snake and they are now wondering how much and what James Singh has told the DEA about the operations of PPP Crime Family Inc. Dougla Rohee & Roger the verbose Luncheon have gone so far as to come out publicly to denounce & contradict the report and take jabs at James ‘am wired for sound’ Singh. Don’t be surprised if PPP Crime Family don’t give James Girvan the Biscuit, Kerzorkee or Joseph O’Lall treatment. Dead on arrival at Georgetown hospital.

good morning doctor leslie ramsammy!

One of the challenges for both lesbians and gay men is dealing with harassment by people of the opposite sex who are attracted to them. Lesbians have to deal with constant questions about boyfriends, marriage, and sex (as do all women). Gay men must deal with machismo, talk of conquests, girl watching, and dirty jokes.

Acceptable U.S. styles for hair, earrings on men, extensive body piercing, and certain mannerisms or clothes may be viewed with suspicion or disfavor in your community. Also, it is important to note that AIDS is a critical issue in Guyana, and gay Americans are sometimes blamed for supposedly bringing the disease into South America.

Gay, lesbian, and bisexual Volunteers should be aware that they will not encounter the level of openness and acceptance that they may be accustomed to in the United States. They will need to be circumspect with Guyanese colleagues and community members about their sexual orientation. Volunteers who decide to reveal their sexual orientation often confide in the medical officer who has been a source of support for Volunteers. Peer support plays a critical role to Volunteers of diverse sexuality. An additional resource is the lesbian, gay, and bisexual returned Peace Corps affiliate group of the National Peace Corps Association.

naeem jr cuts the ribbon as sister anesa looks on.

from left to right: king taliban & cocaine hustler naeem sr, woman we don’t know, the rat dictator, taliban woman we don’t know, queen manniram prashad partially hidden, part face of a woman, pregnant priya ‘he is the father maury’ manickchand,  woman we don’t know and Al Haji Fazeel Ferouz President of the Central Islamic Organization of Guyana with his Jewish imitation headgear. also in attendance were Minister of Housing and Water Irfan Ali, manzoor ‘i work for the russian mob’ nadir, and a whole host of talibanic cocaine royalty, and quislings.

everythings gonna be all right...Insha'Allah

according to 009 Spy Shop the Colombians have landed again and this time they’ve taken  salim juman azeez. remember james girvan singh is also on the run from the venezuelan cartel

009 Spy Shop: Just in. Word on the street that Cocaine Salim was kidnapped by the Columbians over a failed cocaine deal today. Heard he was forced to sell a property (not Tower) to pay off the debt. Confirmation and more info later

February 2010: Local warlords in Ghor province in Western Afghanistan publicly flogged two Afghan women

Emancipation of Afghan women not attainable as long as the occupation, Taliban and “National Front” criminals are not sacked!

rudy circa 1998

Kristine Kupka

until truthbtold sent in the following, we’d never heard of Darshanand ‘Rudy’ Persaud, but it looks like time has finally caught up with rudy and his family in richmond hill who may have been concealing a very dark dar secret. thanks truthbtold. when not on the run, dr darsh as he likes to call himself works at Amberly Family Dentistry in Tampa Florida where bandit pandits prowl. [according to 009 hitman, [see comments below] rudy just happen to be the son.in.law of bandit pandit prakash gossai brother. coincidence? hmmmmmm]

why r u not following the story about rudy persaud that kill his lover and unborn child. people need to no that he is a murder he kill that girl in his cousin store at liberty an run to tampa he tell people he is bramin that she must get abortion or he family will disown him, this boy is a cruel cold hearted bastard, he hiding at denver at his wife sister house and he wife also have a brother livin in san deigo those people are bad people he should give up himself to the police department how long he will run with his 2 soms

ABC: Kupka’s been waiting since 1998 for news on whoever killed her sister. And this week, police are hoping they’re closer to finding an answer, searching beneath the cement floor of a business on Liberty Avenue in Jamaica.
And for years, Persaud’s relatives owned a business at that address. Police asked to search, but they were never allowed. Now, the business has finally changed hands.Rudy Persaud, still married and now a dentist in Tampa, Florida, did not respond to Eyewitness News’ request for a comment.

Florida Department of Health
DARSHANAND PERSAUD
LICENSE NUMBER: DN16252
Profession: DENTIST
License/Activity Status: CLEAR/ACTIVEClick
License Expiration Date: 2/28/2012
License Original Issue Date: 04/17/2003
Discipline on File NO
Address of Record
14463 UNIVERSITY COVE PLACE
TAMPA,FL33613
UNITED STATES

CBS: In the weeks before her disappearance, the main topic of conversation was always the mysterious new man in Kristine’s life.
According to the Kupka family, she and Persaud didn’t date while he was her teacher. But when the semester ended, the relationship began.
“The guy is intelligent and good looking. That appealed to her,” says Kristine’s mother.
Her sister describes the relationship with Persaud as a “crush”, saying it was “initially not a big deal.”
But when she brought him home to meet her roommates, not everybody was as taken with Persaud.
Ozlem Ackadag was Kristine’s close friend as well as her roommate. She says she had an immediate distrust of him: “He is good looking. But his eyes…his eyes are really cold.”
If that was true, clearly, Kristine didn’t see it. And in the summer of that year, Kristine told her friends and family what she thought was good news: she was pregnant with Persaud’s baby.
But according to Ackadag, Persaud did not want any involvement with either Kristine or the child.
Ackadag says the reason was, in part, cultural. Persaud and his family are Guyanese immigrants; his father is a Hindu priest. He reportedly told Kristine he would be disowned and kicked out of the family home if anyone found out about the pregnancy.
“He just went crazy and said ‘No, it’s going to ruin my family. I want nothing more to do with you,’” says Kristine’s mother.
But there was something else that took Kristine entirely by surprise: Rudy Persaud was married.
Says Kathy Kupka, “She was so shocked when he told her he was married. It was shocking. We were all shocked.”
Ackadag says Persaud tried to convince her to have an abortion, adding, “it didn’t make any difference how much he ranted and raved, she was going to have this baby with or without him.”
There was one thing she did want from Persaud. “She was very clear that she was going to put Rudy’s name on the birth certificate and that he might be responsible at some point when she went to law school for helping with money,”says Kathy.
And that, Kristine told her friends, made Persaud absolutely furious.
“I spoke to her four days before she disappeared and she said ‘if anything happens to me, it was Rudy who did it. Just go to the police, because Rudy did it to me,’” says Kristine’s friend Suzie Riordan.

they are saying when the Venezualian find James singh he is dead, he hussle the stuff and never payed.

Guyana is sinking fast. sharpen your tools and clean all your equipment & gear. we’re gonna be needing you soon.

"i am no longer in any drugsman pocket"

important information: clement rohee, guyana’s minister of home affairs is banned from travelling to the United States, Canada or Europe as all three have revoked his visas a number of years back. child raping commissioner of police henry greene is also in the same boat as is child rapist & presidential spokessomething kwame mccoy.

fresh on the heels of ole grey beard calling the 2010 United States (US) Department of State report on International Narcotics Control Strategy bullshit, we have big dougla, a known sexual predator slash serial child rapist who preys on underage girls firing off at the mouth.

“The political will exists at the top. Bharrat Jagdeo has no involvement in cocaine that I know of, none of the ministers of this government is involved in cocaine or cocaine business that I know of. And I know! I am the minister of Home Affair. That why we need the Central Intelligence Agency set up fast. I am no longer in the pockets of any drugs man; I am here to deal with the matter on behalf of the Guyanese people and the government of Guyana,” serial child rapist Minister Clement James Rohee roared.

“The Ministry of Home Affairs continues to reject any notion from white people who think they’re our bosses that Guyana has not been doing enough to counter cocaine and other drugs in the country,” serial child rapist Minister Clement James Rohee said.

dea double agent - james girvan singh, CANU CEO & cocaine thief

“The Report makes reference to the efforts of local Law Enforcement Agencies in the fight against narco-trafficking in Guyana. However, the Report says nothing new save for the usual and few grudging plaudits sprinkled here and there in the text of the document on James Singh,” serial child rapist Minister Clement James Rohee said as he began to get more upset. “Why are these people only praising James Girvan Singh?! Why!!”

“CANU is part and parcel of the task force on Illicit Drugs and Illegal Firearms established to enhance coordination and cooperation among Law Enforcement Agencies in Guyana as called for in the National Drug Strategy Master Plan which we failed to implement but that’s besides the point,” serial child rapist Minister Clement James Rohee said.

serial child rapist Minister Clement James Roheesaid that Guyana is disinclined to be party to any one-sided relationship and reiterated elected dictator Bharrat Jagdeo’s call for partnership based on equity, mutual respect, money and understanding.

“It’s the United States that we see legalizing marijuana shops and have marijuana being sold legally under the guise of medical use. Do you see that happening here in Guyana? No! No way! Never! So we don’t take these people when they come down here preaching to us, or send out these reports. We reject these things without fear or worry. This report is pure rubbish!” serial child rapist Minister Clement James Rohee said with great flair and relish.

serial child rapist Minister Clement James Rohee emphasized that Guyana has never stood on the sidelines in the fight against drug trafficking in fact, it has taken much more proactive interventions than the U.S, such as: polygraphing all members of the Narcotics Branch of the Guyana Police Force and CANU, and intensifying interdiction and eradication exercises on all fronts in various parts of the country.

In 2009, CANU seized 56 kilograms of cocaine woo-hooo, and woo-hooo 52 kilograms of cannabis. The Guyana Police Farce on the other hand, seized woo-hooo 137 kilograms of cocaine, woo-hooo 182, 934 kilograms of cannabis and destroyed woo-hooo 1,074,450 marijuana plants from woo-hooo 124 fields.
“PPP Crime Family Inc. continues to expend significant sums of money to fight this scourge at the level of both demand reduction and supply reduction,” serial child rapist Minister Rohee said.

Work is being done to ensure that there is more control in the importation and use of precursor chemicals in the country to prevent the diversion of the chemicals for illegal use.

serial child rapist Minister Rohee refuted statements in the report suggesting that Guyana has not been attending regional meetings, dealing with drugs.
Guyana has been represented at a number of conferences such as those arranged by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, National Drug Law Enforcement Agencies of Latin America and the Caribbean, Regional Ministerial meetings on the Global Problem of Drug, Security and Cooperation, bilateral discussions with neigbouring countries, meetings aimed at curbing drug trafficking and drug use at the level of the Organisation of American States (OAS) as well as conferences sponsored by the U.S. which serial child rapist Minister or his serial child rapist commissioner of police henry greene cannot attend because both have had their visas revoked.

“Guyana has been cooperating with other countries, including the United States, to identify major drug dealers We have been constantly updating our laws to make our Law Enforcement Agencies more effective,” the serial child rapist Minister said.

serial child rapist Minister said that as long as there is evidence, Guyana remains committed to pursuing both major and minor drug dealers. serial child rapist Minister cited recent efforts by the police to extradite a drug dealer named Barry Dataram to the U.S as testimony to this commitment in the fight against drug trafficking. serial child rapist Minister did not mention that Barry Dataram was last released by Charlie ‘roger khan is my friend’ Ramson the current Attorney General of Guyana.

I refer to the letter by Antoine Craigwell (KN 26 2 10) captioned “Cross-dressing in Guyana ; Is the Supreme Court Courageous?” and would appreciate the opportunity to respond. This response is copied to Guyana ’s Attorney-General, the Guyana Bar Association, and the Bar-Associations and Attorneys-General of the Caribbean . The full text is also attached with a cover page and table of contents, with revisions being posted continuously at http://www.scribd.com/doc/27698238/The-Case-Against-Cross-Dressing-or-Transgender-ism-in-Guyana

“Friend-of-the-Court” Briefs:

We have already dispatched correspondence to the Attorney-General of Guyana advising our interest in having the online document “The Case Against Pancap and the Decriminalization of Homosexuality” be considered as a friend-of-the-court brief in relation to the constitutional motion filed by sasod! The document is 44 pages long, and addresses the wider issue of GBLT-militancy in general.

To satisfy the need for a more reader-friendly document for citizens, parliamentarians, the media, Guyana Teachers’ Union, Guyana trade Union Movement, and members of the Guyana Bar Association, this 10-page brief summarizes the major issues on transgenderism, and is also forwarded to the Attorney-General and Permanent Secretary in Guyana’s Ministry of Legal Affairs.

As introduction to the issues confronting Guyana and the Caribbean today, readers should also note the response in a Stabroek News letter “Nothing ‘Historic’ About Cross-Dressing Constitutional Motion in Guyana” (http://www.scribd.com/doc/27559391/Nothing-Historic-About-Cross-dressing-Constitutional-Motion-in-Guyana ) and a second response to questions raised by a “UG-student” in the Kaieteur News letter “Laws Against Homosexual and Transgender Activity Exist for a Number of Good Reasons” (http://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2010/02/27/laws-against-homosexual-and-transgender-activity-exist-for-a-number-of-good-reasons/ ) to show the consistent application of principle against transgenderism and gay-militancy.

Definitions:

Please refer to “Q&A on Gender Identity Confusion — Sexual Behavior Disorders”; http://www.pfox.org/Q&A-gender-identity-confusion.pdf )

Why are the legal requirements for “human-rights” legislation”?

We have offered before that there is proximity between transgender (cross-dressing) and homosexual issues, hence the nomenclature “GBLT community”. The activity of the one group inevitably becomes the “opportunity” for the other! Guyana ’s courts should be in no doubt about whom or what sasod is promoting in this case! It is not just “cross-dressing”, but rather seeking legal footholds on all Gay, Bi-sexual, Lesbian and Transgender (GBLT) issues, including homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

As to the fallacy of strategy that the GBLT is wont to pursue, essential reading is the book by lawyer and author Roger J. Magnuson (“Are Gay Rights Right: Making Sense of the Controversy”; Multnomah Press; 1992; Portland , Oregon 97266 ). The excerpt below is taken from his arguments at pgs. 67-107, specifically p. 82-89):

“… As we have already seen, proponents of gay rights laws rely heavily on an analogy to other human rights legislation. If human rights laws have provided protection to other minorities, why should society not add one more group to those protected from discrimination?

Hitching their wagon to the broadly based support Americans have traditionally given civil rights laws, gay rights advocates have made surprising progress in the past decade.

The human rights analogy, though popular and politically understandable, cannot withstand careful analysis. Adding homosexual behaviour to a list of classes that includes racial and religious minorities makes no sense. The tenuous balance of social interests represented by these laws is reflected in the few, and carefully chosen, classes they protect.  Relief has been given only in extraordinary circumstances.

To add another protected class, at least five requirements have had to be shown:

(1) A demonstrable pattern of discrimination …

(2) … based on criteria that are arbitrary and irrational …

(3) … causing substantial injury …

(4) … to a class of people with an unchangeable or immutable status …

(5) … which has no element of moral fault …. ”

Transgenderism and gay-militancy fail on these criteria! The real tragedy may well be that sasod never alerted its constituents to the public policy implications that their decision would have.

Again, to the extent that there is proximity, please note the following words of Robert Regier and Daniel Garcia in their online article “Homosexuality is Not a Civil Right” (http://www.crrange.com/wall34.html ):

“… When protecting one’s inalienable and civil rights, the government must discern between liberty and license. This requires that rights attach to persons because of their humanity, not because of their behaviors, and certainly not those behaviors that Western legal and moral tradition has regarded as inimical to the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” as stated in the Declaration. Yet, today some advocate granting “rights” to behaviors hostile to the most fundamental forms of self-government—family, church, and community….”

After reading Regier & Garcia’s treatment, and given the legal, social, medical and moral evidence to the contrary, does Guyana really want to follow the trajectory of tragedy other nations have taken regarding gay militancy and “sexual orientation”? Seven clear rebuttals apply to Craigwell’s letter!

Pit religion against religion? … Or go to referendum?

Firstly, Craigwell’s letter is memorable for the number of factual misrepresentations it makes, and also for confirming that, from a religious standpoint, it will be Hinduism that drives the local effort for the GBLT community, and that such initiatives will be diametrically opposed to Christian, Muslim and most secular outlook here in Guyana. We should mention that the official Hindu community has not commented on Craigwell’s letter at February 28, 2010, and maintains an expected silence.

That this current initiative will therefore involve an intense, and perhaps gory, clash between local religions should not be lost on the government and the judiciary. If we needed proof of that effort to pit religion against religion, then we had to look no further than the now dated and hopelessly biased and one-sided statement by Arif Bulkan, one of the lawyers representing sasod in this current constitutional motion:

“… In Guyana, as in the rest of the Commonwealth Caribbean, we inherited as part of the colonial legacy,  Judeo-Christian  (and) Islamic homophobia and anti-sexuality attitudes which found expression in laws that criminalize private sexual behaviour between men and certain acts relating to commercial sex work…” (“National Assessment on HIV / AIDS, Law, Ethics and Human Rights in Guyana ”; by Arif Bulkan; Page 4, paragraph 3; 2004)

Apart from illustrating scant regard for the tenets of two major faiths in Guyana , the above statement confirms Dr. Joseph Nicolosi’s contention that most current research on GBLT-issues has abandoned solid clinical evidence and research and is now conducted from an “advocacy” or pro-GBLT perspective.

However, the evidence will show that Guyana ’s Supreme Court has ample legal, medical, societal and personal reasons to reject the petition by sasod, and, further, that the court would be wise in not generating inter-religious acrimony among Guyanese citizens and take the safe path of referring the issue to referendum later.

Readers should assess the article “Arguments Against Pancap and the Decriminalization of Homosexuality” ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/17685588/The-Case-Against-PANCAP-and-the-Decriminalization-of-Homosexuality ). Sasod’s puerile arguments about the “victimless” nature of “sexual orientation” cases is dealt with at pages 21, 23 and 24 of that treatment. Read also the dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia in Lawrence v Texas on pages 25-35. In particular, the following comments should be helpful in illustrating that an emotional and ad hoc approach to interpreting the law has serious repercussions:

“…. This effectively decrees the end of all morals legislation. If, as the Court asserts, the promotion of majoritarian sexual morality is not even a legitimate state interest, none of the above-mentioned laws can survive rational-basis review….” (Scalia, J. dissenting at page 30 of “Arguments Against Pancap …” above)

“…. It is indeed true that “later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress,” ante, at 18; and when that happens, later generations can repeal those laws. But it is the premise of our system that those judgments are to be made by the people ….” (Scalia, J. dissenting at page 32 of “Arguments Against Pancap …” above)

What are the practical repercussions that Guyana can immediately foresee?

Secondly, consistent with our submissions in 2007 captioned “Supporting Gay Rights Laws Would Court Legal Disaster” (http://rogerwilli.blogspot.com/2009/06/supporting-gay-rights-laws-would-court.html ) Valerie Leung (25/2/10) poses the following commentary to the Guyanese plaintiffs, defendants, lawyers and judges, and anyone else who would listen, or who would be tempted to listen to Craigwell’s romanticized version of chaos and social degeneracy:

“… I noted with grave concern a recent report in the Stabroek news that SASOD has brought a case before the courts in Guyana in which they claim that it is unconstitutional to prosecute cross-dressing. The nation should be made aware that this is a slippery slope.

Besides, I wonder if the very lawyers who are representing SASOD would like to have any of their male staff, lawyers included, arrive at work dressed as a woman, or meet clients or attend court dressed as a woman, and not be able to prevent this. This is actually how it is in California .

If, for example, you hire a man who is in male attire and a few days after he commences employment he comes to work dressed and made-up as a female, you can not dismiss him or even require him to dress as a man while at work. As far as I have heard there is a hefty fine for any employer who dares to do this.

Would the judges who will hear this matter, or employers in general, like to live in a Guyana where it is normal and acceptable to have male bank tellers, teachers,  MPs, mayors, etc; dressed in pearls and lipstick and skirts while at work if they so desire? In a few jurisdictions in the US the majors are openly cross-dressers and go to their offices in mini-skirts, etc;!! …”

With these words, we infer that Craigwell’s reasoning will reach its illogical end in a futuristic free-for-all of societal chaos. That it is much closer that we thought in other jurisdictions is clear. The article “The A.P.A. Normalization of Homosexuality, and the Research Study of Irving Bieber”, found at http://www.narth.com/docs/normalization.html concludes with the following astonishing speculation which illustrates what happens when science is replaced by “human rights” arguments:

“… Dr. Bieber pointed out that there were several other conditions in the DSM-II that did not fulfill the “distress and social disability” criteria: voyeurism, fetishism, sexual sadism, and masochism. A.P.A.’s Dr. Spitzer replied that these conditions should perhaps also be removed from the DSM-II — and that if the sadists and fetishists were to organize as did the gay activists, they, too, might find their conditions normalized…”

Transgenderism as Gender-Identity/Mental/Psychosexual Disorder

Thirdly, Craigwell clearly ignores the evidence in the scientific community about transgenderism being a gender-identity and mental disorder. Now, societal affirmation of transgenderism as “normal” will inevitably lead to clamours for sex-change operations as in the American experience.

We should refer the court to the testimony of a University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University , in 2005, as he makes a fatalistic pronouncement on the tragedy that this represents (“Transgenderism is a Gender-Identity Disorder; Transgenderism is a Mental Disorder” found at http://www.pfox.org/Transgenderism_is_gender_identity_disorder.html ). At the beginning he asks a deeply worrying question, illustrative of the fact that even our most academically qualified citizens have an innate awareness of the significance of creation-structures such as manhood and womanhood:

“… When the practice of sex-change surgery first emerged back in the early 1970s, I would often remind its advocating psychiatrists that with other patients, alcoholics in particular, they would quote the Serenity Prayer, “God, give me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.” Where did they get the idea that our sexual identity (“gender” was the term they preferred) as men or women was in the category of things that could be changed? …”

Towards the end of that treatment on ‘Surgical Sex’, we find these disturbing words: …

“… Reiner, however, discovered that such re-engineered males were almost never comfortable as females once they became aware of themselves and the world. From the start of their active play life, they behaved spontaneously like boys and were obviously different from their sisters and other girls, enjoying rough-and-tumble games but not dolls and “playing house.” Later on, most of those individuals who learned that they were actually genetic males wished to reconstitute their lives as males (some even asked for surgical reconstruction and male hormone replacement)—and all this despite the earnest efforts by their parents to treat them as girls. …”

It gets worse! Dr Paul McHugh, the author of that report, goes on to make this cataclysmic pronouncement:

“… We have wasted scientific and technical resources and damaged our professional credibility by collaborating with madness rather than trying to study, cure, and ultimately prevent it. …”

What is to be learned from Proposition 8 and the Delhi High Court decision:

Thirdly, it was in fact the Delhi High Court that passed the decision to repeal Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, but Craigwell sees no discomfort in not making that distinction, and this validates our previous contention that the arguments of the GBLT community and gay-militancy are constructed upon a colossal web of half-truths and misrepresentations. Opposition to the ruling by the Delhi Court is still very strong!

We have already detailed the case against the Delhi decision in the online article “The Delhi High Court Decision should be Rejected, not lauded!” (http://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2009/07/09/the-delhi-high-court-decision-should-be-rejected-not-lauded/ ). Part of that fateful document reads:

“… Second, there is a geo-political thrust to Sidibe’s arguments, having nothing to do with HIV/AIDS. For Sidibe, then, India’s activist High Court ruling, sure to be challenged, represents a shot in the arm for the tired arguments spawned by gay militancy and a recklessly unprofessional confederacy of its supporters in the UN ….anxious for any “victory” after the astonishing defeat to opponents of Proposition 8 in the USA (see “Why Proposition 8 will Stand in 2010”; http://www.esnips.com/web/Proposition8 ).

There, the people simply got fed up with “court decisions” that pilfered their traditional values and democratic principles, and voted down yet another effort to redefine marriage, this being the holy grail of “decriminalization” crowd.

We had hopefully addressed some of the issues in the online article “The OAS Resolutions on Sexual Orientation Do Not Reflect the Will of the people of the Region” (http://www.stabroeknews.com/2009/letters/06/13/oas-resolutions-on-sexual-orientation-do-not-reflect-the-will-of-the-citizens-of-the-region ). The caption of this article was not accidental, since, with the threat of democratic opposition action at the grassroots, an entire swathe of gay-rights “victories” are being engineered not in the polls where the people have a voice, but in activist courts and legislatures, and by executive order. This is a slap in the face for voters, and all done in the name of “human rights! …“

Transgenderism simply a subset of unconstitutional “Sexual-Orientation” issues/arguments

Fourthly, transgenderism DOES in fact relate to “sexual orientation” issues (however camouflaged as “gender’ in the current constitutional motion), and lawyer Roger J. Magnuson offers to Guyana’s Supreme Court that to go further in supporting GBLT and/or “gay rights” ordinances, “anti-discrimination” or “hate-crime” legislation of the sort sasod wants would be to court the following legal disasters (cited in “Are Gay Rights Right? Making Sense of the Controversy” by Roger Magnuson; Multhnoma Press, Portland Oregon , 97266 ; 1990; Pages 98-100):

(1) Negating the right of parents or school districts to control the moral calibre of the person who teaches their children;

(2) Negating the right of an employer to determine whether an applicant’s moral character will affect his job performance, and;

(3) Negating the right of churches and other religious entities to exclude, or refuse to hire, someone whose lifestyle is contrary to their religious convictions.

A literal-minded judge would find that such laws give protection to a large number of sex criminals. Take, for example, the possible “protected” behaviours under a (GBLT) rights ordinance:
* A convicted child molester, homosexual or heterosexual, could sue a day-care center that refuses to hire him, claiming discrimination on the basis of his “sexual orientation”; such an ordinance would thus protect behaviour declared criminal under state law.

* An insurance company could be sued for refusing to extend health insurance benefits to the sodomy partner of a homosexual or to the wives of a polygamist. The insurance company would be discriminating on the basis of “sexual orientation” by refusing to extend coverage to “spouses” because of their sexual preferences. Since both sodomy and polygamy are prohibited under … state law, such an ordinance would protect behaviour already declared criminal.

* A landlord who refuses to rent or sell a facility to a person running a house of prostitution could be sued for refusing to rent or sell housing based on the person’s “sexual orientation”. Yet prostitution is a crime under (state) law.

* A bank that refuses to loan money to moviemaker who enjoys making and selling child pornography would be discriminating against the moviemaker on the basis of his “sexual orientation”. Yet the making/selling of child pornography is a crime under most state law.

* Law enforcement officials who arrest the customers of prostitutes, pornography stores, or child sex rings could be sued under the ordinance for “obstruction of practices unlawful under this chapter (of the law)” if it is viewed that the police are discriminating against people who patronize certain “public accommodations” based on their specific “sexual orientation”. Prostitution, the sale of pornography, and sex with children are all crimes under state statutes. Such an ordinance could protect behaviour declared criminal under state law.

Using Transgenderism/Gender-Identity-Disorder to further gay-rights and gay militancy

Fifthly, it will not escape the attention of readers that the situation that Magnuson is so clear at defining above now becomes the issue of tyrannical court behaviour in the first decade of the 21^st century … “tyrannical” in the sense that judges are now wont to make law rather than interpret the constitution, or to understand that the will of the people in referendum or voting is to be respected.

Again, we have offered before (page 2) that there is proximity between transgender (cross-dressing) and homosexual issues, hence the nomenclature “GBLT community”… and it bears repeating. The activity of the one group inevitably becomes the “opportunity” for the other! Guyana ’s courts should be in no doubt about whom or what sasod is promoting in this case! It is not just “cross-dressing”, but rather legal footholds on all Gay, Bi-sexual, Lesbian and Transgender (GBLT) issues, including homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

The intersection all comes together in the stated goals of the gay militant agenda … these have always followed the “rights” argument!

Source: (Gay Pride March on Washington DC April 25, 1993)

1. Demands for the repeal of all laws regarding sodomy!

2. Demands for the legalization of all forms of sexual expression including paedophilia!

3. Demands to change the age of consent to allow sex with minors!

4. Demands for public funding to cover Aids patients medical expenses!

5. Demands for public funds to cover sex-change operations!

6. Demands for the legalization of same-sex marriages!

7. Demands for legalization of adoption, custody and foster care within the same-sex marriage structure!

8. Demands for the inclusion of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals and transgenders in education and childcare!

9. Demands for public funding of artificial insemination of lesbians and bisexuals!

10. Forbid religious (now artistic) concerns regarding homosexuality from being expressed … already the case on radio/TV in Canada (and now England ). This is done through “anti-discrimination” and “hate-crime” legislation.

11. Ban prayer in public schools.

12. Remove God from civic life!

13. Demands that the Boy Scouts and Army be required to accept homosexuals!

The use and abuse of the judiciary as a vehicle to these long-term ends has been legendary, and the motion ostensibly aimed at cross-dressing is a first shot at that goal as Craigwell freely admits. The issue has been the source of much worry in the courts overseas during that time, and it behooves us to learn from their experience. It is clear to see the trajectory of initiatives that sasod is committed to with this motion.

Roger Magnuson (“Are Gay Rights Right? Making Sense Of The Controversy!”; p.93 – 102) has, as a lawyer, documented the insidious pursuit of these goals that led to the misguided decision in Lawrence v. Texas, and Justice Antonin Scalia’s unusual request then to read his dissent to the Supreme Court in the USA:

“… One long term goal of the homosexual movement has been to repeal laws prohibiting sodomy. Although gay rights activists have concentrated on promoting gay rights ordinances, they have not abandoned their attack on existing sodomy statutes. As long as their behaviour remains criminal, it is hard for them to argue that that they deserve special protection for it. When challenging sodomy statutes, homosexuals argue that there is a “right to privacy” in the Constitution that protects private acts of consensual sodomy.

In making that argument, homosexuals rely on cases that interpret the Constitution as forbidding government interference with private decisions. And so, for example, a consensual “right of privacy” has been held to protect decisions about education and child-rearing, marriage, and more recently contraception and abortion [Griswold v. Connecticut 381 US 479 (1965) and Roe v. Wade 410 US 1113 (1979)]. Homosexuals have argued from these cases that just as the law cannot unconditionally forbid a couple to use birth control, it cannot forbid two consenting adults to commit sodomy in the privacy of a bedroom [Oklahoma City School Board v. National Gay Rights Task Force 727 F.2d1270 (10^th Cir., 1984; US, 1985)].

Although homosexuals had some initial success in state and federal courts using such arguments, the Supreme Court settled the question in Bowers v. Hardwick (478 US 186, 1986). Mr. Hardwick had bought suit in federal district court, challenging the constitutionality of the Georgia statute that criminalized consensual sodomy. He lost at the district court level, but won on appeal to the Court Of Appeals, which held that the Georgia statute violated his fundamental rights. The Supreme Court disagreed. In a vigorously written opinion, Justice White pointed out that any fundamental liberties protected by a right to privacy must be “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty”, or deeply rooted “in the nation’s history and tradition.”. Because sodomy was traditionally a criminal offense in all states, to find that a right to engage in anal or oral sodomy was deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition or is “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” would be “at best facetious”. Summing up, the Court said:

“And if Respondent’s submission is limited to the voluntary sexual conduct between consenting adults, it would be difficult to , except by fiat, to limit the claimed right to homosexual conduct while leaving exposed to prosecution adultery, incest and other sexual crimes, even though they are committed in the home. We are unwilling to start down that road.”

In a concurring opinion, Justice Burger pointed out the moral dimension:

“To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.”

Justice Burger’s opinion paralleled a recent circuit court decision from the District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals which had approved the discharge of a homosexual from the military. Finding homosexuality “a form of behaviour never before protected and indeed traditionally condemned,” the court held that its decision would be based on constitutional principle, not on shifting public opinion [Dronenberg v. Zech 741 F.2d 1288 (D.C. Cir., 1984)].

Such federal decisions have left homosexuals two options: convince state courts that there is a right to commit sodomy under the state constitution, or convince legislators to repeal the statute.

Because homosexual activists have been unable to convince the courts that their sexually deviant behaviour should be given special protection, they have tried to work harder on Congress, state legislatures, and city councils. The passage of gay rights laws would inevitably lead to the repeal of sodomy laws….”

We would similarly find transgenderism to be “a form of behaviour never before protected and indeed traditionally condemned” and thereby urge Guyana ’s Supreme Court to “base its decision on constitutional principle, not on shifting public opinion!” Neither is the law “archaic”, since it still addresses compelling social and medical issues!

It would be prudent at this stage to remind everyone of the stunning similarity between the above account for the USA and the current push for the transgender issue in Guyana . Thereafter, however, it is also apposite to refer to the words of Dr. Paul McHugh, quoted earlier above, on transgenderism as gender-identity and mental disorder:

“… We have wasted scientific and technical resources and damaged our professional credibility by collaborating with madness rather than trying to study, cure, and ultimately prevent it. …”

Should laws be passed to “protect” transgenders from “discrimination”?

“… Legal protection against discrimination based on mental illness is not provided for any other disorder. Those who wish to assume a “gender identity” contrary to their biological sex are in need of mental health treatment to overcome such disturbed thinking, not legislation to affirm it.

“Gender identity” legislation endangers the physical and mental health of the very people it is trying to protect. Physically mutilating the mentally ill is not the answer. For example, will healthy limb amputation, another mental disorder known as Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID), be the next protected class? (See Newsweek story: http://www.newsweek.com/id/138932 )

Nor should we encourage men and women to consume life-long hormones in a daily battle to overcome their natural biology. Hormones cannot change the chromosomes that determine one’s sex.

Abolishing gender and making believe it doesn’t really matter for the rest of the population is also not the answer.

One goal sought by gay groups is to ensure that transgenders of all types have legal access to the public bathroom of their choice, regardless of their actual birth sex. See http://www.transgenderlawcenter.org/pdf/PIP%20Resource%20Guide.pdf This can make public bathrooms and dressing rooms unsafe for women and children. It is a huge step backwards for women’s rights.

After disrupting their bodies with radical surgery and hormone pills, transgenders approach PFOX for help in leaving the transgender lifestyle. They need funds for gender affirming therapy, reversal surgery, and breast explants.

If legislators want to protect transgenders, they can start by giving them the therapy they need….”   ( http://www.pfox.org/Q&A-gender-identity-confusion.pdf )

Do parents know that sasod is targeting teenagers for homosexual/transgender relationships?

Seventhly, we should consider that Ras Ashkar has already been brave enough to point out to Guyanese parents that sasod has over the past two years been actively targeting their teenage sons and daughters at its website with the euphemistically labeled URL “The Experimenting Teenager”. This would be considered “expected” behaviour but for the galling farce of innocence that the group presents to what has up to now been a very tolerant public. Sasod’s entire website is dedicated to promoting gay rights!

How can they any longer be as tolerant? Sasod is playing them with one hand and stabbing them … and their children … in the back with another!

Guyanese parents would be similarly distressed to find that of the only two male appointees to the nation’s Rights Of the Child Commission, one (Vidyratha Kissoon) owns the sasod website and the other (Kwame Mckoy) has been implicated in a sex-tape scandal soliciting sex from a male minor.

How does one place this rather disturbing state of affairs in perspective? Perhaps the following will help!

Dr.  Steve  Baldwin’s  law  review  “Child  Molestation  and  the  Homosexual  Movement”  (  http://www.regent.edu/news/lawreview/articles/14_2Baldwin.doc );  14  REGENT  U.L.  REV.  267 2002) illustrates the imperative that should guide entire national policies:

“… Unfortunately,  the  truth  is  stranger  than  fiction.  Research confirms that homosexuals molest children at a rate vastly higher than heterosexuals, and the mainstream homosexual culture commonly promotes sex with children. (See W.D. Erickson et al, Behavior Patterns of Child Molesters, 17 ARCHIVES SEXUAL BEHAV. I, 83 [1988] and numerous other references on page 2 of 16 in Dr. Baldwin’s review). Homosexual leaders repeatedly argue for the freedom to engage in consensual sex with children, and blind surveys reveal a shockingly high number of homosexuals admit to sexual contact with minors. Indeed, the homosexual community is driving the worldwide campaign to lower the age of consent… ”

And it is in this context that sasod’s misadventure into politicizing our courts with the relatively easier “target” of cross-dressing needs to be understood.

It gets worse … as Judith Reisman outlines below … and Guyana’s courts will have to thereby note the implications of giving anything away to the GBLT community!

If promiscuity and pedophilia defines the psychosexual disorder known as homosexuality (being “Gay” in the GBLT community) then the implications for its decriminalization, like that for transgenderism, has taken on new and staggering proportions when assessed against the increasing cases of abused children being affected with HIV in the USA and other developed nations.

The  other  law  review  “Crafting  Bi/Homosexual  Youth”,  by  Judith  Reisman,( http://www.regent.edu/news/lawreview/articles/14_2Reisman.doc ) will illustrate the grave obstacles Guyana’s courts will later have to contend with deriving from sasod’s innocent motion:

“… Perhaps the most worrisome of these anti-science activities has been the limited amount of governmental research examining the connection between early child sexual abuse and pediatric AIDS. Dr. Laura Gutman, a respected child sexual abuse researcher, and her colleagues found in their preliminary government funded studies that 14.6% of children in the study with AIDS had “been sexually abused . . . . Transmission by child sexual abuse was the most frequent of the proven modes of acquisition of HIV in this population.”

Twelve males were identified (n=8) or suspected (n=4) of being perpetrators.  The lack of funding for such studies may deserve a congressional inquiry.  To hide the fact that most AIDS children appear to be infected by bi/homosexuals, the “World AIDS Day” artfully reports that “16% of adolescents with AIDS, aged 13 through 19 . . . have been infected through heterosexual contact,” rather than that 84% of AIDS children are infected by male bi/homosexual sex abuse….”

Consider thereafter the following commentary on transgenders and Gender-Identity-Disorder (GID):

“… There is a strong correlation between sexual abuse and GID. According to one counselor, “80% of the transgenders he’s treated were molested as children. Transgenders also suffer from feelings of rejection and enter into a fantasy life…” “The diagnosis of GID is itself a changing diagnosis since some children diagnosed with GID may later in life display few, if any, symptoms….” ( Source: “Q&A on Gender Identity Confusion — Sexual Behavior Disorders”; page 4 of 7’ http://www.pfox.org/Q&A-gender-identity-confusion.pdf )

These persons so afflicted need treatment, not legislation to protect or affirm a civil wrong.

Conclusion:

Armed with the evidence above, Section 153(1) (xlvii) of the Summary Jurisdiction (Offences) Act, Chapter 8:02, takes on a new character.

It does NOT appear irrational, discriminatory, undemocratic, contrary to the rule of law and unconstitutional. In effect, it serves a good and useful purpose in maintaining the national ethos.

Mandatory treatment of psychosexual and gender-identity disorders would seem a better option than “affirming” the condition via legislation.

We should peruse the 2001-article by Dr. Joseph Nicolosi: “The Removal of Homosexuality from the Psychiatric Manual” ( http://www.cssronline.org/CSSR/Archival/2001/Nicolosi_71-78.pdf ).

An excerpt follows:

“….To some, this approach may sound reactionary and anti-gay, antisexual, anti-freedom. Rather, for those men who seek an alternative to the gay lifestyle, this is progressive treatment. Indeed, many men have found these ideas to reflect a truth they sense within themselves. This approach acknowledges the value of gender difference, the worth of family and traditional social values, and the importance of the prevention of gender confusion in children….”

The words of Robert Regier and Daniel Garcia need to be repeated here:

“… When protecting one’s inalienable and civil rights, the government must discern between liberty and license. This requires that rights attach to persons because of their humanity, not because of their behaviors, and certainly not those behaviors that Western legal and moral tradition has regarded as inimical to the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” as stated in the Declaration. Yet, today some advocate granting “rights” to behaviors hostile to the most fundamental forms of self-government—family, church, and community….”

Sasod and their supporters would, again, be found to be actively trying to deceive the Guyanese people.

They should be rejected yet again!

Yours faithfully

Roger Williams, Georgetown, Guyana, March 1^st 2010
“The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ,
and the love of God, and the communion
of the Holy Spirit, be with you all. Amen.”

“RogerWilli” at Yahoo Messenger

“His (Moulana Siddiq Ahmad Nasir’s) lecture I am sure will lead us all to greater understanding of the Holy Quran, the life and the works of the Holy Prophet,” dictator Jagdeo said. [we suppose he also means tolerating child molestation]

the child molester is the African male seated right in the front row

in this photo below the child molester fakes interest in what Shaik Ibrahim Habach-Imam has to say

the child molester fakes interest in Shaik Ibrahim Habach-Imam

we got these photos from the office of the dictator website. we won’t be surprised if they now go ahead and remove them. we will monitor them. these criminals have no shame! always remember that as well.

old gray beard aka lying stink beard

At a post-Cabinet press briefing at the Office of the President, Head of the Presidential Secretariat (HPS), Dr. Roger Luncheon today noted that Government’s initial reaction to the 2010 United States (US) Department of State report on International Narcotics Control Strategy it is that is “more walk, less talk, all bullshit.”

“The expectations of the new US administration responding constructively to the widespread criticisms of the existing US anti-narcotic regime, Cabinet felt that it those expectations are dwindling because the United States government is full of shit,” the HPS said.
Government is of the view that Guyana cannot continue to bear the brunt of a one-sided burden in the fight against narco-trafficking by the chief imperialists.
Dr. Luncheon said that recognition must be given to the interventions made and sustained by the Government of Guyana and PPP Crime Family Inc. However, he maintained that Guyana needs more assistance specifically as it relates to the flow of information, which he said has to be less one-sided, technology transfer and tools and greater collaboration at the bilateral and international levels.
“The drug fight at the level of the Government of Guyana has seen improvements due to legislative interventions taken by the Administration and the continuation of existing policies dealing with integrity testing, with no help whatsoever from the United States of America – a nation that finds pleasurable delights in lecturing us on what we must and must not do. We would like to remind the Unites States State Department that Guyana is an independent country” the HPS said.
However, he noted that the lack of sustained support which is of extreme importance in achieving maximum effect of the interventions made continues to engage the attention of the Government.
The HPS highlighted that the one-sided flow of information is one such area that Government has been struggling against.
“We still feel that the Americans are harbouring a terrorist, we have given them information about a major player on the arson committed on the Ministry of Health. We were advised by the Americans in the context of mutual assistance in criminal matters, that indeed they have identified the person and discovered that he was a deportee, who went back to America under an assumed name,” he said
Dr. Luncheon reiterated that Guyana needs more support from the international community particularly the US in order to sustain its efforts in the anti-narcotic fight.
With respect to the Mutual Assistance Treaty with the US, the HPS said that Government provides information and collaborates, however the level of reciprocity is cause for great dissatisfaction.
In 2009, Guyanese law enforcement agencies seized over 137 kilograms of cocaine, compared to 48 kilograms in 2008 and 167 kilograms in 2007. There were 648 criminal charges filed against small times pushers and individuals for activities related to the trafficking or distribution of illicit drugs compared to 473 in 2008. Guyana government also maintains its previous position of not arresting nor extraditing any of its major drug trafficers.

‘The United States of America cannot dictate to us who they want extradited,’ Dr. Luncheon reiterated at the end of the press briefing.

At property “A” (Sulphur Rose), assay results have been received from the initial trenching and drilling program conducted at the property.

Results from three (3) trenches excavated to date have returned a best interval of 4.98 g/t Au over 103.2 meters, (trench No. 1). Several other zones with anomalous Au grades have been delineated (Refer to table for complete results). Trenching has confirmed the 300 X 100 meter Au anomalous zone earlier delineated by soil augering.

Nine diamond drill holes, totalling 1804 meters, have been drilled up to this date to test the sub-surface continuity of the Au anomalous zones delineated from the trenches. The Company has received assays from two holes to date, the rest are pending.

Drill Hole SDH-1 returned elevated gold values of 0.44 g/t Au over 52 meters and 1.03 g/t Au over 13 meters. SDH-2 yielded 1.62 g/t Au over 41 meters including higher grade intervals of 2.47 g/t Au over 24.5 meters and 6.06 g/t Au over 7 meters (Refer to table for complete results). Results from SDH 1 and SDH-2 confirmed the existence of a new Au mineralized field at the Aranka district. The anomalous Au zones are hosted in felsic intrusives and tuffaceous sediments showing intense quartz-chrome mica-pyrite alteration.

Drilling will continue to test the lateral and vertical extent of the mineralization. Soil augering and road mapping has continued within the immediate vicinity of the property and preliminary results show a geochemical signature similar to the current drilling area.

                               DRILLING RESULTS

                                March 4, 2010

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    UTM Coordinates                   Drill Intercept
                       (PSAD 56)      Azimuth   Dip      (meters)      Grade
    AREA  Hole No. ------------------  (True (degrees)---------------(g/t Au)
                   Easting   Northing  North)        From   To   Width
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
          SDH-01  217915.9   760024.6   170    -50     92   105  13.00  1.03
                                                     ------------------------
                                                      121 173.5  52.50  0.44
                                                     ------------------------
                                             includ-  131   154  23.00  0.58
                                              ing
    Sul-  -------------------------------------------------------------------
     phur
     Rose -------------------------------------------------------------------
          SDH-02  217966.8   759748.5   350    -45     73   114  41.00  1.62
                                                     ------------------------
                                             includ- 82.5   107  24.50  2.47
                                              ing    ------------------------
                                                       92    99   7.00  6.06
                                                     ------------------------
                                                      124   133   9.00  1.43
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------

                               TRENCH RESULTS

                                March 4, 2010

                  -----------------------------------------
                                         Trench
                  AREA      Trench      Channel      Grade
                              No.         Width    (g/t Au)
                                        (meters)
                  -----------------------------------------

                         Trench No. 1    103.20       4.98
                                        -------------------
                          including       79.20       5.71
                         ----------------------------------

                         ----------------------------------
                         Trench No. 2     39.20       0.96
                  Sul-                  -------------------
                   phur                   16.00       3.83
                   Rose  ----------------------------------

                         ----------------------------------
                         Trench No. 3     36.20       2.78
                                        -------------------
                                           6.00       1.14
                                        -------------------
                                           6.00       2.58
                  -----------------------------------------

The Company is mobilizing a second drill rig to the area in order to expedite the ongoing drilling program. Six geologists are actively exploring the district where extensive geophysical and geochemical investigations have delineated several areas for additional exploration. The Company has budgeted $6 Million for the Aranka program over the next twelve months.

This news release and its contents have been reviewed by Mr. Augusto Flores IV (P.Geo), a qualified person within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101.

About Guyana Goldfields Inc.

Guyana Goldfields Inc. is a Canadian based mineral exploration company primarily focused on the exploration and development of gold deposits in Guyana, South America where the Company has operated since 1996. The Company is currently undertaking technical studies to advance and develop the Aurora Gold Project in Guyana which is slated to begin production mid 2012. The Aranka Properties, currently in advanced staged exploration, are drilling highly-prospective targets in an ongoing program. As at the date hereof, the Company has approximately $79 million in cash and short-term bank guaranteed investment certificates and no debt.

Forward Looking Statements – Certain information set forth in this news release may contain forward-looking statements that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the control of Guyana, including, but not limited to the impact of general economic conditions, industry conditions, volatility of commodity prices, risks associated with the uncertainty of resource and reserve estimates, currency fluctuations, dependence upon regulatory approvals, the availability of future financing and exploration risk. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements.

%SEDAR: 00022477E

For further information: Guyana Goldfields Inc., Claude Lemasson, President & COO, Jacqueline Wagenaar, Director of Investor Relations, Tel: (416) 628-5936 Ext. 2295, Fax: (416) 628-5935, E-mail: jwagenaar@guygold.com, Website: www.guygold.com